Saturday, November 15, 2008

Thoughts and Rambles on Twilight

DISCLAIMER: Please do not read this if you have not read Twilight yet. It contains spoilers and I don't want to spoil your reading. But well, if you'd like to be spoiled, then go ahead.

I’ve just read Twilight.

Not that because it’s a big deal because it isn’t. I don’t want to seem to announce that I’ve joined the bandwagon of Twilight fans, because I have not. I have wanted to read Twilight because I was curious. Curious of who Edward Cullen is. I wondered if he is one of those male book characters next in the line of the likes of Mr. Darcy, a man of character and honor. Another reason –-which is a bit silly though—is simply his name, Edward. I’ve always liked the name Edward. Such a beautiful name.


Starting off with names, I must say Stephenie Meyer has a very good taste in names. I loved the names, Carlisle, Isabella, Esme, and of course, Edward. I loved their names but what’s more important is that they measure up to their beautiful names. I have nothing to say with Dr. Carlisle and Esme. They are a great couple. Showed love and compassion to people around them. They weren’t selective.


Edward on the other hand was faithful enough to his name, which meant, wealthy guardian in Old English. He’s literally wealthy with his Volvo and splendid home. He never left Bella. He has a sense of self-control more than Bella does.


I think Bella a self-serving imp. Not one bit did she live up to her beautiful name. I dislike her. Not because Edward likes her but because her character isn’t something to look up to. All she thought of was herself. She says that she cares for Edward yet her actions betray her. One instance was when Edward insisted that she informs her father that they are going out. She never told him. That totally irked me. Even if she doesn’t like her father it isn’t a valid reason to disrespect him. He has the right to know because she lives under his care. Whether she hates her father so much, I don’t care. Charlie is her father, no matter how odious he may be, he deserves respect.


Compare Bella’s and Edward’s family. I appreciate the Cullens very much because of their openness. I admire how Carlisle has educated his “children.” The Swans, on the other hand, are not even trying very much to restore their relationship.


Edward knows how to act accordingly unlike Bella. He has manners and quite a good character. I think that’s very important. Edward doesn’t deserve Bella unless she reforms and equals Edward in character. Her so much called love, is nothing more than obsession. And obsession is so much different from love. She doesn’t really understand Edward. Edward wants what’s good for her and she doesn’t get that. She knows she’s weak but have she ever tried becoming strong for Edward? I think not.


I hope to have a higher regard for Bella in New Moon and I hope Edward doesn’t fall short of my expectations on him on the sequel. As you might have also noticed in this rambling of reactions on the book, I evaded the fact that the Cullens were vampires. I did it on purpose. I just want to focus on the character they have and not their being. The character of a novel character—especially the protagonist’s—is very important to me.


As for Edward Cullen falling in line with the celebrated gentleman book characters such as Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gilbert Blythe, Aragorn, George Knightley, etc. he is a little near it—dodging the fact of course that he’s a vampire. I’m not sure though if his character could outlast or even equal the reputation of Mr. Darcy in almost two centuries since Pride and Prejudice have been published. Time can only tell.


Twilight is an okay reading for leisure though I would only recommend it to people who have a good understanding of what is fiction and what is not, what is character and what is not, what is commendable and what is repudiating. I would not recommend Twilight to my younger siblings until they are 17 or 18 and have a good understanding of what I have just mentioned.


Twilight is an enjoyable book with its supernaturalities and turns but not deep enough to reread again and again. It doesn’t have the depth I’m looking for. The words are just there. One read and you understand it. I prefer challenge in books where you have to delve into sentences because it’s trying to point out something important. Twilight isn’t just that. Therefore, Twilight falls into my category of Leisure Reading.


****************************************************************************

“Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider.”

~Sir Francis Bacon, one of the great essayists who ever lived

****************************************************************************


7 comments:

Alyssa said...

Should I hide? (I'm talking about my blog.) Yeah. *grin* I knew you'd like it. :)

You can't follow my blog. Yet. :P I'm sorry...I just haven't figured out to make an RSS feed thingy...or something like that. Techy talk again.

About Twilight, I haven't read it yet. I just read the first two pages in the third book and then put it down. I guess I won't be reading it anytime soon either because it's rather contrary to my beliefs. =)

Anonymous said...

Oh yes... you should hide! I'm going to send a vampire after you! LOL!

I'm not recommending Twilight so much anyway. The thing I liked about it was that, even if there were vampires, it didn't scare me.
But of course there are lines that are not properly drawn between what is good and evil, and that's enough to make me not recommend it.

There were chases that were exciting... (ya know, the kind of chases they have in Firebird) Or perhaps I just like chases so much. Haha! I feel like running with characters when there are chasings.

I'll wait till I get to the third book, Breaking Dawn to draw my conclusions. ;)

Anonymous said...

And yeah, I forgot to mention. The name Edward is still beautiful without Edward Cullen. There's Edward Rochester you know of Jane Eyre. Have you begun it? =) Sorry if I spoiled the name for you but I assure you, I will not tell of Edward Rochester's fate in Jane Eyre. ;)

Alyssa said...

Oh man, no. I have not yet started Jane Eyre. I'm soooo busy! :D

Anonymous said...

Hey! I got here from the Rebelution forums and just wanted to say thanks for the review. It's always hard for me to decide whether or not I should think about reading a book when it's popular. Most popular books I wouldn't be seen dead with. Anyhow... I like the name Edward, too! =D Not that I'll read Twilight based on that fact...

Christin A. said...

Hi Onerebelutionary! :) Yeah... that was a shallow reason but then Edward Cullen could never replace Mr. Darcy. Mr. Darcy is not a perfect being but he is the best gentleman created in books. ;)

For additional recommendation, don't read books just because they're popular. To quote Sir Francis Bacon, read to weigh and consider.

I think my classmates were disappointed though that after reading Twilight, I did not fall in love with Edward. :D Well, it's just that someone with such perfect features could not really exist... even in books.

Anonymous said...

Hi, I haven't read Twilight, yet, and I'm probably not going to. I've heard so much about it, and it just didn't strike me as the thing I'd want to read. By the way, I love the name Edward.. and Edmund, and Edvard. Yeah, and I'm from the Rebelution, too.